- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:13 pm to Obtuse1
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:13 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
Presidents clearly engage in public and private acts while in office. Some acts are easily defined as one or the other there are certain acts that are much more muddy.
That's absolutely correct. There is no doubt that presidents should have immunity for many of their public acts. Their private acts must meet legal muster. Hence, limited immunity. I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand.
1
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:05 pm to exiledhogfan
quote:
immunity for many of their public acts. Their private acts must meet legal muster. Hence, limited immunity. I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand.
That part is not difficult. The issue is who gets to decide when an act can be labeled as private and outside presidential authority. DOJ is arguing that they should get to decide but SCOTUS is not going to rule on their favor. The difficult question is how are they going to rule on who gets to decide?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News