- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Soltamayor is awful
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:00 pm to RAB
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:00 pm to RAB
I'm not exactly sure how many sides that DOJ dude has to his mouth.
At one point he was talking about how no scheme is perfect and in closing he was arguing that the current scheme is just fine and any changes would undermine the status quo.
Not to mention the absolute acrobatic entanglements the DOJ is putting forward to argue that there is a discernable difference between public and private acts by the Executive in some cases but, wait for it, not in others.
And they are still using stale arguments, like setting up contingent Electors in AZ - which is not illegal in any sense, to provide foundation of intent or motive. I found it especially enjoyable when the guy contradicted himself about eleventy-hundred times to avoid addressing any diffinitive tests for intent or motive.
The coup-de-gras was a lame attempt to assure errybody that this is a one-off and no worries because of reasons. Reasons that apparently include the good behavior and judgement that will be extorted from future Executives by allowing the DOJ to destroy Trump.
What a shite show...
At one point he was talking about how no scheme is perfect and in closing he was arguing that the current scheme is just fine and any changes would undermine the status quo.
Not to mention the absolute acrobatic entanglements the DOJ is putting forward to argue that there is a discernable difference between public and private acts by the Executive in some cases but, wait for it, not in others.
And they are still using stale arguments, like setting up contingent Electors in AZ - which is not illegal in any sense, to provide foundation of intent or motive. I found it especially enjoyable when the guy contradicted himself about eleventy-hundred times to avoid addressing any diffinitive tests for intent or motive.
The coup-de-gras was a lame attempt to assure errybody that this is a one-off and no worries because of reasons. Reasons that apparently include the good behavior and judgement that will be extorted from future Executives by allowing the DOJ to destroy Trump.
What a shite show...
2
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:19 pm to SoggyBottomBaw
everything you said is exactly how I took it listening to some of it. but was waiting for the experts to opine. Dreeben was all over the place like a gay man at an orgy in line to get a blow job.
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:24 pm to SoggyBottomBaw
quote:
The coup-de-gras was a lame attempt to assure errybody that this is a one-off and no worries because of reasons.
This keeps coming back up in various areas.
Say “selective prosecution” without saying “selective prosecution.”
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News