Started By
Message

re: Why is Haleigh Bryant not on the U.S. Olympic team?

Posted on 4/22/24 at 4:36 pm to
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34828 posts
Posted on 4/22/24 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

he difference between college gymnastics and Olympic is the difference between AA baseball and the Major Leagues.


Bad comparison. Not for the top collegiate gymnast.

I mean there are currently Olympic gymnasts competing in college. No major league players are dropping down to AA and not even being the best person on their team.

I mean LSU has a freshman that could be an Olympic gymnast and also one that will be in the Olympics for the Philippines. Neither of them are as good of college gymnasts as Haleigh.

Haleigh could be an Olympic gymnast, she just chose a different route. College gymnastics has come a long long way from the time that no Olympian's were competing in college.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20582 posts
Posted on 4/22/24 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

quote:

he difference between college gymnastics and Olympic is the difference between AA baseball and the Major Leagues.



Bad comparison. Not for the top collegiate gymnast.

I mean there are currently Olympic gymnasts competing in college. No major league players are dropping down to AA and not even being the best person on their team.

It's actually a fair comparison as far as level of difficulty goes, once you factor in the other variables.

Some of the harder skills are easier to perform with a 15 yr old body than a 20 yr old body. Your point of balance can change depending on development. You lose your maximum potential flexibility at some point.

So, age-related changes, if a big leaguer wanted to keep playing baseball for the sake of it, and just couldn't see or catch up to MLB fastballs anymore, he could go down into AA level. At that point in his career he may not be the best on that team, either. That just happens in a much tighter age range in gymnastics, because baseball emphasizes different physical characteristics.

Since gymnastics isn't about the money to the extent baseball (or other huge spectator sports) is, someone continuing to compete just due to love of the sport is more common. We're not going to see MLB All-Stars hang around in the minors after their prime. It's maybe more similar to Senior Golf, where you could see former elites still playing well after they peaked and declined.
It's just that gymnastics is weird, because the age range is so low. We don't tend to think of college as "senior citizens", but that's what it is for most gymnasts.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17773 posts
Posted on 4/22/24 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

College gymnastics has come a long long way from the time that no Olympian's were competing in college.


The advent of NIL and the ability to capitalize monetarily from the Olympics and still maintain "amateur student athelete" status is probably the main driver of that.

quote:

Color me pleasantly surprised that a number of people gave smart, educated answers to this.


Goes to show a few things:

LSU has a gymnastics fan base. Anybody that pays attention to the attendance knows that, but people are really invested in this team, or program moreso than just this team. I've been following for a few years and learn a little more every year.

The other thing is that the LSU fans that are the chicken little or snarky types that permeate the fan bases of other sports haven't yet decided to come into gymnastics threads that aren't about Livvy Dunne. Gymnastics threads are a breath of fresh air, for now.
This post was edited on 4/22/24 at 6:00 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram