Started By
Message

re: Thousands Of Popular Food Snacks Face Bans

Posted on 4/18/24 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by LSUGUMBO
Shreveport, LA
Member since Sep 2005
8791 posts
Posted on 4/18/24 at 1:35 pm to
I actually don't mind this. I hate that we have to legislate out ingredients that are proven to be non- beneficial at best, and out right bad for every human being at worst, but they are 100% non-necessary. Little Tommy doesn't care if his star marshmellows are a little less yellow or his Fanta isn't electric orange. He'll still drink it.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
73178 posts
Posted on 4/18/24 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

this. I hate that we have to legislate out ingredients that are proven to be non- beneficial at best, and out right bad for every human being at worst, but they are 100% non-necessary. Little Tommy doesn't care if his star marshmellows are a little less yellow or his Fanta isn't electric orange. He'll still drink it.
This.

The majority of this crap isn’t needed.
Posted by Dairy Sanders
Member since Apr 2022
2963 posts
Posted on 4/19/24 at 6:18 am to
quote:

actually don't mind this. I hate that we have to legislate out ingredients that are proven to be non- beneficial at best, and out right bad for every human being at worst, but they are 100% non-necessary. Little Tommy doesn't care if his star marshmellows are a little less yellow or his Fanta isn't electric orange. He'll still drink it.


This right here. This isn’t like limiting beef consumption for bullshite “climate change” reasons. These ingredients are unnecessary, artificial, and proven harmful. This is something the Federal Government should absolutely be doing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram