Started By
Message

re: Did y'all catch Dave Ramsey rip George Kamel apart over withdrawing 4% from retirement?

Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:24 am to
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2182 posts
Posted on 4/3/24 at 9:24 am to
He knows most his core audience would capitulate if they knew 4% SWR was the realistic planning factor. He is selling hope and financial freedom for folks w little or no savings. Tell them they need $1m to replace $40k income and most wont think it's attainable and will just say F it and keep living beyond their means.

He's either an idiot for not understanding sequence of returns risk or a being a savvy/somewhat slimy marketer. I dont think he's actually that dumb. Dave has done a lot of good but this one really irritates me. I get it, if he doesnt want to take away people's hope but it's very disingenuous unless he is just a fool.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
269 posts
Posted on 4/3/24 at 11:06 am to
I have been looking at safe withdrawal estimates for a long time. I think the 4% rule is a good starting point for estimating how far retirement assets will go but the math behind it is very rigid. For instance, are you going to withdraw 4% from your retirement account every year and quit? Or, after a couple of good years in the stock market, are you going to withdraw 9% so you can buy a new truck (or roof, or AC) that year, but figure you are still safe because 4% of what's left is going to be enough next year? Are you going to try to get by on 3.5% if the stock market declines for a couple of years, maybe skip a vacation or something? When you compare the options of taking Social Security at age 62, 67, or 70 do you still plan to draw your assets down by 4% in each scenario?

It's a very typical of economists who keep preaching that the economy is like a pie, and that if someone gets a bigger piece, then everyone else's piece has to be smaller. In reality, everyone will adjust their spending somewhat to conditions. We see that every day in economic statistics when consumer adjust their spending based on how they perceive the economy. You will do the same in retirement, and a great many will crash and burn regardless of what withdrawal rate they choose.

In all those "Monte Carlo Analysis" scenarios, usually something like 8% is a safe withdrawal rate in something more than 60% of all scenarios (don't hold me to exact numbers this is off the top of my head), and 4% is safe in 95%. I don't go out deep sea fishing when there are 12 foot swells, if the water is too rough, I stay home. That's how people live, and how most are going to manage retirement assets. The 4% rule, or 8%, or 12%, are useful numbers, but life is different than that, and you will adjust your behavior to the situation at hand. If you have been good at doing that all your life, you probably will continue to be good in retirement.

Just remember the fable of the ant and the grasshopper. If the market is good for a few years, plan on that truck, but plan on stashing some of your wealth in some asset to prepare for the inevitable times when the market will not be good.

This post was edited on 4/3/24 at 11:17 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram