- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pit bull ownership check in thread
Posted on 4/2/24 at 12:04 am to NPComb
Posted on 4/2/24 at 12:04 am to NPComb
quote:
but ALL breeding should be terminated.
I think this would end with unintended consequences. If you eliminate the Pits you have done nothing to eliminate the people that want aggressive and intimidating dogs. They will simply move on and destroy another breed or breeds. If you think a Pit can do damage to a human it is nothing compared to what a Cane Corso, Kangel, or Dogo Argentino could do bred with the same eye for aggression. They all three have a bite force at least double that of a Pit and are bigger, stronger, and faster. It would be trading a .380 for a .44 Mag you don't want to get shot by either but given the choice you will take the .380 slug all day everyday.
Imagine this masticating on your thigh at over 700 psi.
ETA I should have included the Bully Kutta in the list but god help us if the trashy owners found out about them. They would be the nuclear option and already bred for fighting.
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 12:12 am
5
Posted on 4/2/24 at 12:08 am to Obtuse1
You are implying what that logic that it is solely owner's fault that pitbulls are aggressive. This isn't true. Read link of my previous comment just one above here. Pitbulls are responsible for 77% of dog on human death despite making up 6% of dog population. No drastic difference that massive can ever be attributed to human training. When the stats are that vastly different, exponentially overrepresented in a certain area and pretty much make up every human death, that solely lies on genetic predisposition. Ugly dogs, ugly behavior. All should be impounded.
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 1:53 am
Posted on 4/2/24 at 12:34 am to Obtuse1
quote:
ETA I should have included the Bully Kutta in the list but god help us if the trashy owners found out about them. They would be the nuclear option and already bred for fighting.
In your google searching did you bother to look at prices?
Trash aren't spending thousands for a dog.
Pits are overbred and often free.
I'd just as soon shelters had an automatic kill policy for the things.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 12:43 am to Obtuse1
quote:
think this would end with unintended consequences. If you eliminate the Pits you have done nothing to eliminate the people that want aggressive and intimidating dogs. They will simply move on and destroy another breed or breeds. If you think a Pit can do damage to a human it is nothing compared to what a Cane Corso, Kangel, or Dogo Argentino could do bred with the same eye for aggression. They all three have a bite force at least double that of a Pit and are bigger, stronger, and faster. It would be trading a .380 for a .44 Mag you don't want to get shot by either but given the choice you will take the .380 slug all day everyday.
I've read a lot of stupid frickin posts on TD, but this one takes the cake. You have obviously never been around pitbulls or dogs in general. Pitbulls are born killers. I love dogs more than humans, but would have no problem shooting a pitbull preemptively.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 12:43 am to Obtuse1
quote:$3500 with papers
Cane Corso
Posted on 4/2/24 at 9:51 am to Obtuse1
Anyone who lives rural should have a Kangal and Great Pyrenees. Nobody will screw with you. And a good shepherd inside for good measure.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News