Started By
Message

re: Nuclear War in South Louisiana

Posted on 3/26/24 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9755 posts
Posted on 3/26/24 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

What’s the reason for different scenarios? If someone were willing to drop 500 nukes on us why wouldn’t they drop 2,000 if they have them available?

2,000 warhead scenario is a first strike, targeting military installations and defense/industrial infrastructure. That’s why you see so many black dots around ND/MT/WY - trying to destroy our ICBMs.

500 warhead scenario assumes a retaliatory strike where our first strike would have (presumably) taken out a fair amount of their nuclear assets. So they have less missiles overall. And in that scenario it doesn’t make a whole hell of a lot of sense to target ICBM installations if we’ve already launched. So they’re targeted at population centers to maximize casualties instead.

It’s all kind of hypothetical and hinges on key assumptions about how exactly a nuclear war would play out, but it’s basically an illustration of MAD principles.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
16165 posts
Posted on 3/26/24 at 4:40 pm to
I wonder if these scenarios are why so many sooner/prepper/extreme libertarian types move to Wyoming and Idaho. Appears to be areas in both states that would be low chance of attack in both scenarios
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram