quote:
But that’s probably the only thing that she shouldn’t have said in her statement. She openly said she refused to talk to the reporter for two years and then said that he didn’t give them enough time to respond.

What is so hard to understand here?

A sleazeball journalist writes a hit piece on CBK.

The same sleazeball journalist keeps asking CKM for an interview. She refuses because she knows he's a sleazeball.

The sleazeball journalist drops a list of accusations on her demanding responses or he will release his hit piece as is right before an important tournament game when he knows there is no way CKM and her advisors would have the time to properly prepare a fully vetted legal response.

CKM rightly complains about the sleazeball being a sleazeball.

Where is the contradiction?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by RealityTiger

Geismar, LA

Member since Jan 2010

20455 posts

Posted on 3/25/24 at 3:59 am to TDTiger225

Anybody who doesn’t get it doesn’t want to get it.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by tigerbait2010

PNW

Member since May 2006

29335 posts

Posted on 3/25/24 at 4:19 am to TDTiger225

You’ll lose your shite even glancing at the comment section for articles like this regarding mulkey. You’d think we were peak Miami hurricanes football with the melts regarding Mulkey and her teams…you know, the same ones that have won 4 nattys and countless 30 win seasons. The same Mulkey who has impacted the lives of probably 1000 women in a positive light.

Politics shouldn’t be involved but plenty of friends on both sides of the isle agree journalism has a slant for better or worse.

Her entire life and story has been pretty epic and I’d imagine anyone tuning in would be mortified if their lives were under the microscope like hers is.

This post was edited on 3/25/24 at 4:20 am

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board