- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which teams would you trade rosters including draft assets with?
Posted on 3/26/24 at 10:47 am to shel311
Posted on 3/26/24 at 10:47 am to shel311
So many responses to my post I can't go through them all Just a few points.
You can give +/- stats all you want (I'm the worst person to give that stat to because I hate that stat so much), and act like that proves Wemby effect winning more than Lebron, but I prefer to look at it a little more simply...
The fact is, LeBron inherited an incredibly bad team, the worst in the NBA, and right away, made them much better. Wemby inherited an incredibly bad team, and they are still incredibly bad. Winning percentage wise, even worse. +/- have a place, but I'm sorry, LeBron impacted winning more than Wemby. A significant amount of actual wins tell me more than a flawed stat. I'm fine saying that Wembys bad cast, is worse than LeBrons bad cast (even though you're making it seem like LeBrons team was actually good) and that the current West is better than the 03/04 East.
I think it will take a few years to make a better comparison. LeBron took the worst playoff teams I have ever seen in my lifetime to the playoffs in his third year and eventually the worst roster I've ever seen in an NBA finals. Odds are the Spurs aren't going to be a much better roster next year and at some point you have to start looking at actual wins.
quote:
See above, he does, more so than rookie Lebron affected winning.
Now what?
You can give +/- stats all you want (I'm the worst person to give that stat to because I hate that stat so much), and act like that proves Wemby effect winning more than Lebron, but I prefer to look at it a little more simply...
The fact is, LeBron inherited an incredibly bad team, the worst in the NBA, and right away, made them much better. Wemby inherited an incredibly bad team, and they are still incredibly bad. Winning percentage wise, even worse. +/- have a place, but I'm sorry, LeBron impacted winning more than Wemby. A significant amount of actual wins tell me more than a flawed stat. I'm fine saying that Wembys bad cast, is worse than LeBrons bad cast (even though you're making it seem like LeBrons team was actually good) and that the current West is better than the 03/04 East.
I think it will take a few years to make a better comparison. LeBron took the worst playoff teams I have ever seen in my lifetime to the playoffs in his third year and eventually the worst roster I've ever seen in an NBA finals. Odds are the Spurs aren't going to be a much better roster next year and at some point you have to start looking at actual wins.
Posted on 3/26/24 at 11:00 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:But again, On/Off is very important to this equation.
The fact is, LeBron inherited an incredibly bad team, the worst in the NBA, and right away, made them much better.
When both rookies were on court, the teams weren't that different.
When both rookies were off court, Lebron's supporting cast was respectable at least, Wemby's is all time level bad. I'm not sure how you can blame Wemby but give Lebron credit. The data shows it's pretty clear that Wemby's cast is much, much worse than rookie Lebron's. If that were not true, his cast would play much better when he's off court, but they don't.
quote:But why? Exactly how? Rookie Lebron was good, no question. Rookie Wemby is by far more impactful defensively, that's not a question. But Rookie Lebron was an awfully inefficient scorer, substantially worse than Wemby.
but I'm sorry, LeBron impacted winning more than Wemby.
I'm just trying to figure out where rookie Lebron made all of these differences, when none of the data backs it up that he was clearly and obviously a bigger difference maker than Wemby. You can try to use wins/losses, but again, I'll point to on/off as that is extremely important to tell the entire story here.
quote:In fairness, we're judging individual players, not better teams, so wins/losses is a flawed stat as well.
A significant amount of actual wins tell me more than a flawed stat.
Do you think Chet has been better than Wemby this season? I think that ultimately proves the point. Wemby has blown by Chet in the 2nd half of the season and is pretty clearly the better player, but his team is like 30 games worse.
quote:I'm just providing data, that's all.
even though you're making it seem like LeBrons team was actually good
quote:Certainly. And again, I'm not saying Wemby will be the GOAT or even has a good chance to be the GOAT. Just stating that's where his ceiling, the best possible version of him as a player can be.
I think it will take a few years to make a better comparison.
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:30 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
The fact is, LeBron inherited an incredibly bad team, the worst in the NBA, and right away, made them much better. Wemby inherited an incredibly bad team, and they are still incredibly bad. Winning percentage wise, even worse. +/- have a place, but I'm sorry, LeBron impacted winning more than Wemby. A significant amount of actual wins tell me more than a flawed stat.
The biggest difference is the Cavs were trying to win and the Spurs are not.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News