Started By
Message

re: Which teams would you trade rosters including draft assets with?

Posted on 3/26/24 at 10:47 am to
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
35780 posts
Posted on 3/26/24 at 10:47 am to
So many responses to my post I can't go through them all Just a few points.

quote:

See above, he does, more so than rookie Lebron affected winning.

Now what?


You can give +/- stats all you want (I'm the worst person to give that stat to because I hate that stat so much), and act like that proves Wemby effect winning more than Lebron, but I prefer to look at it a little more simply...

The fact is, LeBron inherited an incredibly bad team, the worst in the NBA, and right away, made them much better. Wemby inherited an incredibly bad team, and they are still incredibly bad. Winning percentage wise, even worse. +/- have a place, but I'm sorry, LeBron impacted winning more than Wemby. A significant amount of actual wins tell me more than a flawed stat. I'm fine saying that Wembys bad cast, is worse than LeBrons bad cast (even though you're making it seem like LeBrons team was actually good) and that the current West is better than the 03/04 East.

I think it will take a few years to make a better comparison. LeBron took the worst playoff teams I have ever seen in my lifetime to the playoffs in his third year and eventually the worst roster I've ever seen in an NBA finals. Odds are the Spurs aren't going to be a much better roster next year and at some point you have to start looking at actual wins.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111707 posts
Posted on 3/26/24 at 11:00 am to
quote:

The fact is, LeBron inherited an incredibly bad team, the worst in the NBA, and right away, made them much better.
But again, On/Off is very important to this equation.

When both rookies were on court, the teams weren't that different.

When both rookies were off court, Lebron's supporting cast was respectable at least, Wemby's is all time level bad. I'm not sure how you can blame Wemby but give Lebron credit. The data shows it's pretty clear that Wemby's cast is much, much worse than rookie Lebron's. If that were not true, his cast would play much better when he's off court, but they don't.
quote:

but I'm sorry, LeBron impacted winning more than Wemby.
But why? Exactly how? Rookie Lebron was good, no question. Rookie Wemby is by far more impactful defensively, that's not a question. But Rookie Lebron was an awfully inefficient scorer, substantially worse than Wemby.

I'm just trying to figure out where rookie Lebron made all of these differences, when none of the data backs it up that he was clearly and obviously a bigger difference maker than Wemby. You can try to use wins/losses, but again, I'll point to on/off as that is extremely important to tell the entire story here.
quote:

A significant amount of actual wins tell me more than a flawed stat.
In fairness, we're judging individual players, not better teams, so wins/losses is a flawed stat as well.

Do you think Chet has been better than Wemby this season? I think that ultimately proves the point. Wemby has blown by Chet in the 2nd half of the season and is pretty clearly the better player, but his team is like 30 games worse.
quote:

even though you're making it seem like LeBrons team was actually good
I'm just providing data, that's all.
quote:

I think it will take a few years to make a better comparison.
Certainly. And again, I'm not saying Wemby will be the GOAT or even has a good chance to be the GOAT. Just stating that's where his ceiling, the best possible version of him as a player can be.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432331 posts
Posted on 3/30/24 at 7:30 am to
quote:

The fact is, LeBron inherited an incredibly bad team, the worst in the NBA, and right away, made them much better. Wemby inherited an incredibly bad team, and they are still incredibly bad. Winning percentage wise, even worse. +/- have a place, but I'm sorry, LeBron impacted winning more than Wemby. A significant amount of actual wins tell me more than a flawed stat.

The biggest difference is the Cavs were trying to win and the Spurs are not.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram