Started By
Message

re: Quiet On Set: Nickelodeon Documentary

Posted on 3/20/24 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
10175 posts
Posted on 3/20/24 at 3:26 pm to
I am not defending Schneider in any way, he was an a-hole that abused his power and allowed predators to gain access and power over kids.

BUT

Him being a misogynistic a-hole that made kids film scenes with sexual inuendos is a far cry from the Brian Peck guy and the other guy that actually molested and raped kids.

Not saying that Schneider wasn't a POS. He definitely was. But the focus of the documentary missed, imo, because they tried to act like being an a-hole and a misogynist is equal to raping children.

I think I was soured going in knowing the main "investigator" is a writer for Business Insider who is known to approach a story with an angle and only look for evidence to support that angle while ignoring any evidence that does not support the angle.

I also thought the main focus should have been on the overall climate of Hollywood and abusing children rather than how much of a dick Dan Schneider is.
Posted by roderickmallen1
Member since Mar 2024
1 post
Posted on 3/20/24 at 8:48 pm to
I agree with you. I think they wanted to sell the story of the bad producer guy but knew no one wanted to sit through a boring documentary. They knew the implication of dude being a predator was a lot more interesting. Problem is, nothing corroborates that story.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36532 posts
Posted on 3/21/24 at 10:03 am to
I doubt we'll watch this because it sounds painful and infuriating. From previous threads in here I'd assumed that Schneider had gone far past the innuendo and foot fetish stage into being a full fledged predator.
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 10:04 am
Posted by JodyPlauche
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
9206 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Not saying that Schneider wasn't a POS. He definitely was. But the focus of the documentary missed, imo, because they tried to act like being an a-hole and a misogynist is equal to raping children.


That was my take. I even sent a friend of mine a text, it said, "I am starting not to like the show in episode 4. Are they really comparing child rape to people who got yelled at?"

So I agree with you 100%!

Why did the other thread get wacked?
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 11:57 am
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
43676 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 9:36 am to
quote:

But the focus of the documentary missed, imo, because they tried to act like being an a-hole and a misogynist is equal to raping children.


This reminds me of the Norm Macdonald Cosby joke.
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
5760 posts
Posted on 4/2/24 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

But the focus of the documentary missed, imo, because they tried to act like being an a-hole and a misogynist is equal to raping children.

Actually, in Hollywood today, being a misogynist (male oppressor) is literally worse than being a pedo (oppressed minority group)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram