Started By
Message

re: USAF plans to retire more A-10 Warthogs; “crippling” close air support capabilities

Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:45 am to
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19756 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 10:45 am to
quote:

am a yuge warthog fan but the time is coming. These airframes are old and the mission set is not needed as much since we are now transitioning back to Great Power Competition. In a modern conflict with China or Russia the A-10 would not have good survivability odds.


CAS relies on air superiority.

We would arguably achieve that with the current assortment of fighters.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11361 posts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

CAS relies on air superiority. We would arguably achieve that with the current assortment of fighters.

My question is accepting that CAS is not possible until local ADS and airspace are controlled, why would you not want these available for use as soon as superiority is achieved?

Unless the drones and attack helicopters are so pervasive that they are redundant and unnecessary I don’t understand mothballing the platform (not that this is that *yet*).

Personally I think that even next gen fighters will become unsurvivable over enemy territory against a China level threat and that missile and drone swarms controlled by AI and remote operators will be the obvious path after the first month or two of a major conflict between the US and China occurs.

Of course I don’t think we have the logistical infrastructure to support that fight for a year even setting aside the a symmetric and Chinese insurgent cells they have ready to activate against us domestically but that’s an entirely separate discussion.
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 12:30 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram