- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Scott McAfee is ruling on Fani Willis disqualification tomorrow
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
More curious to me is that if Wade is kicked from the money train, how does his ex-wife react and how vicious does that set of proceedings become?
If he is no longer the special prosecutor there is no reason to try and seal or hide any motions in this case and no reason to stop depositions regarding Wade's involvement with Willis. With no potential gravy train to protect, the preliminary settlement talks are more about getting a huge chunk of current assets, not the potential cash flow from being the special prosecutor longterm.
So no need to try and "help" Wade knowing that in Georgia proof of infidelity is weighed in the division of property...
If he is no longer the special prosecutor there is no reason to try and seal or hide any motions in this case and no reason to stop depositions regarding Wade's involvement with Willis. With no potential gravy train to protect, the preliminary settlement talks are more about getting a huge chunk of current assets, not the potential cash flow from being the special prosecutor longterm.
So no need to try and "help" Wade knowing that in Georgia proof of infidelity is weighed in the division of property...
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:38 am to laxtonto
If you read the findings, the Judge says there is no explicit proof of when the relationship started or stopped, only the potential appearance of impropriety of it being there.
So if there is no proof of it, he let Willis stay. But now the ex-wife will need to prove dates to use the adultery aspect to influence her potential judgment. So you would then have to then depose both Wade and Willis.
So the Judge says no real proof and sets up a system where the divorce attorney will then be forced to get the proof on record if she wants to maximize what she gets in the judgement...
I am not sure if the judge is that subtle/sneaky enough politically to do this to avoid having to force getting his hands dirty by forcing much harsher scrutiny on Willis and Wade in additional hearings or just punting it and most likely getting lucky by having others do the work for him.
So if there is no proof of it, he let Willis stay. But now the ex-wife will need to prove dates to use the adultery aspect to influence her potential judgment. So you would then have to then depose both Wade and Willis.
So the Judge says no real proof and sets up a system where the divorce attorney will then be forced to get the proof on record if she wants to maximize what she gets in the judgement...
I am not sure if the judge is that subtle/sneaky enough politically to do this to avoid having to force getting his hands dirty by forcing much harsher scrutiny on Willis and Wade in additional hearings or just punting it and most likely getting lucky by having others do the work for him.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News