- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Presidents should be allowed to serve more than 2 terms, so long as only 2 are consecutive
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:38 pm to Tarps99
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:38 pm to Tarps99
quote:
Maybe we need a rule like the British Prime Minister. Except that there are 4 year max terms. Once a year, Congress can have a vote of No Confidence
You have to explain what you're trying to accomplish. The PM system in UKI has produced little good since Thatcher. Sunak is a Tory? lol.
I'm not an advocate for the Chinese 400 year horizon when it comes to politics, but ooh boy, we're not good. This speaks to US Navy construction, in the foremost of my mind. The Navy keeps us as rocking as we can, like the British Fleet kept England alive for centuries. Roll out a hundred destroyers in five years. Send them everywhere.
AEGIS and naval artillery fix almost anything, if you have enough. Let's have enough.
2
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:42 pm to LemmyLives
Just read an article that hypersonic missiles are the end of carrier power.
I don’t see how that doesn’t include the rest of the Navy as well at some point.
The next wars will be heavily based from space.
We are already developing orbiting space defenses. They deploy then wait for instructions on what to kill in space.
I don’t see how that doesn’t include the rest of the Navy as well at some point.
The next wars will be heavily based from space.
We are already developing orbiting space defenses. They deploy then wait for instructions on what to kill in space.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 7:13 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
You have to explain what you're trying to accomplish. The PM system in UKI has produced little good since Thatcher. Sunak is a Tory? lol.
My goal would be to have an ability to call an election mid term if Congress feels that the President is doing a poor job.
No what vote would trigger this is another question, a simple majority vote in each house, or a vote of electors where the Senators and House Members act like electors and if more than 270 vote No Confidence, then a new election is held.
That way it gives Congress another check on the power of the Presidency like an impeachment but without having to have a trial and needing 67 votes in the Senate.
Now will this get political fast, it may, but it also puts power in voters to give them an opportunity to vote on a new candidate or keep the incumbent.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News