- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ozempic maker Novo Nordisk surges past Tesla with market value of $566B
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:38 am to LSUfan4444
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:38 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
Would you be in favor of doing something with the costs similar to a deductible or donut hole? Let's say a patient wants ozempic, okay, pay 100% of the costs until ____ is met. Then pay 80% until ____ is met. Then pay 60 % so on and so on with continued coverage based on positive outcomes, no intolerances, no allergic reactions or severe side effects? You could also incentive patients to receive more coverage for the drug costs with in rage lab results (CMP, CBC, Lipid profile and A1C done quarterly) and in control BP results for quarterly visits with their PCP. Wouldn't this incentives people learn about, introduce and implement a healthier lifestyle rather than starting with the prescription? Distancing from big pharma is a necessity in this country. Becoming more dependent on it is just accepting a loss.
Dude I wasn’t arguing against or for anything
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
As a physical therapist in a hospital I’m constantly in shock about how even the most seemingly obvious information regarding activity, diet, exercise, etc is completely unknown to the general population.
What is being discussed as healthy on places like here compared to the general populace (even extremely productive successful members of it) are light years apart.
It would need to start with some kind of test of the emergency system on every phone in America alerting as to what is actually healthy
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 11:41 am
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:50 am to St Augustine
I didnt say or think you were arguing, I was only posing an alternative to "there's no way that can be done"
I do agree, there is alot of confusion and misinformation and my only point is that alot of work can be done on the forefront before we start people on high cost medications.
We have room for improvement on both sides for sure but the answer is not "well people just won't get healthy because they don't know how sop lets just give as many people as possible this magic diet pill and keep our fingers crossed." (a bit hyperbolic, I know)
I do agree, there is alot of confusion and misinformation and my only point is that alot of work can be done on the forefront before we start people on high cost medications.
We have room for improvement on both sides for sure but the answer is not "well people just won't get healthy because they don't know how sop lets just give as many people as possible this magic diet pill and keep our fingers crossed." (a bit hyperbolic, I know)
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:53 am to St Augustine
quote:
It would need to start with some kind of test of the emergency system on every phone in America alerting as to what is actually healthy
They wouldn’t pay attention. We need ozempic because the government won’t restrict ebt usage to healthy foods. shite. The government doesn’t even know what food is “healthy”.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)