Women don't understand inflation. I had a woman tell me that she just assumed egg prices were up because roosters were transitioning to hens and thereby sexual contact had dropped. And that she was for it! Every chicken has the right to determine if they are a rooster or hen.

When I explained to her that hens didn't need to have sex to lay eggs, she asked if gay chicken couples could have chics of their own without adopting.

At that point I realized that females personalize issue and tend to explain phenomenon via feelings and social constructs. While a man might immediately think about chicken egg supply and demand, or inflationary monetary policy, or deficit government spending, the woman starts musing about the hen's life and how stressed she must feel at our insatiable appetite for eggs.. etc.

So women are empathic, loving creatures. But they are strangers to logic on a day to day basis.
This is not to say that they can't be great scientists or doctors, or practitioners of rigidly developed science. What it does mean is that, on a daily basis, when operating outside of their narrowly defined and rigidly trained sphere of competence, a woman shifts into an empathetic, daydreamy way of being, which makes them really lousy voters.

This post was edited on 3/6/24 at 4:48 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by BRgetthenet

Member since Oct 2011

117736 posts

Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:27 am to RiverCityTider

And that’s why having a man explain who they should vote for, most effectively from a husband or their father, is important.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by wackatimesthree

Member since Oct 2019

4262 posts

Posted on 3/6/24 at 6:48 am to RiverCityTider

quote:
But they are strangers to logic on a day to day basis.

I've explained this before.

Women are not strangers to logic. They can use logic just fine (which is why they CAN be doctors and lawyers and such, to quote Willie Nelson). They can use logic just fine...when they want to.

The difference between women and men is that women are not beholden to logic the way men are. They do not consider it to be the ultimate authority the way men do.

If men disagree, they do so by attempting to show that their opponent has misused logic. They hold logic as the authority by which they know all questions or disagreements must be decided and petition for their viewpoint to be considered more consistent with logic's rules. Even if they lose their way and begin to argue emotionally, they will not admit it, because they know that in admitting that they are admitting the worst defeat of all...having argued outside of logic.

Women don't give the tiniest little squirt of piss about dismissing logic altogether. They aren't ashamed of it, they see nothing wrong with it, and do not consider it a defeat or an admission of defeat.

A man will never say this, but a woman won't blink twice before saying (after you have made an impenetrable logical case about something), "I don't care. I feel __________ and that's that."

A man's final authority is logic. A woman's final authority is her feelings.

She can use logic, but she feels no obligation to kneel before it.

This post was edited on 3/6/24 at 6:50 am

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board