- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John King: Trump Surging With Working Class, Hispanics, Blacks…But A Giant Problem Appears
Posted on 3/6/24 at 3:44 am to LuckyTiger
Posted on 3/6/24 at 3:44 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
“Trump is winning practically every rural and small town voter.”
Doesn’t matter these people are far outnumbered by metro areas now who aren’t voting for Trump.
Posted on 3/6/24 at 4:21 am to ronricks
Women don't understand inflation. I had a woman tell me that she just assumed egg prices were up because roosters were transitioning to hens and thereby sexual contact had dropped. And that she was for it! Every chicken has the right to determine if they are a rooster or hen.
When I explained to her that hens didn't need to have sex to lay eggs, she asked if gay chicken couples could have chics of their own without adopting.
At that point I realized that females personalize issue and tend to explain phenomenon via feelings and social constructs. While a man might immediately think about chicken egg supply and demand, or inflationary monetary policy, or deficit government spending, the woman starts musing about the hen's life and how stressed she must feel at our insatiable appetite for eggs.. etc.
So women are empathic, loving creatures. But they are strangers to logic on a day to day basis.
This is not to say that they can't be great scientists or doctors, or practitioners of rigidly developed science. What it does mean is that, on a daily basis, when operating outside of their narrowly defined and rigidly trained sphere of competence, a woman shifts into an empathetic, daydreamy way of being, which makes them really lousy voters.
When I explained to her that hens didn't need to have sex to lay eggs, she asked if gay chicken couples could have chics of their own without adopting.
At that point I realized that females personalize issue and tend to explain phenomenon via feelings and social constructs. While a man might immediately think about chicken egg supply and demand, or inflationary monetary policy, or deficit government spending, the woman starts musing about the hen's life and how stressed she must feel at our insatiable appetite for eggs.. etc.
So women are empathic, loving creatures. But they are strangers to logic on a day to day basis.
This is not to say that they can't be great scientists or doctors, or practitioners of rigidly developed science. What it does mean is that, on a daily basis, when operating outside of their narrowly defined and rigidly trained sphere of competence, a woman shifts into an empathetic, daydreamy way of being, which makes them really lousy voters.
This post was edited on 3/6/24 at 4:48 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News