- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If the US Supreme Court would rule against Trump ...
Posted on 3/5/24 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/5/24 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
Gotcha. Makes sense.
I do not think the mass media and the reports on the issue are very clear.
This argument would make more sense and to my knowledge the issue has never been raised in the courts.
Basically this is an argument b/w "Absolutely Immunity for any action regardless whether w/in the scope of office or not" vs. "Limited Immunity for only actions that fall within the scope of office".
I do not think the mass media and the reports on the issue are very clear.
This argument would make more sense and to my knowledge the issue has never been raised in the courts.
Basically this is an argument b/w "Absolutely Immunity for any action regardless whether w/in the scope of office or not" vs. "Limited Immunity for only actions that fall within the scope of office".
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News