Started By
Message

re: Judge rules no attorney-client privilege for Nathan Wade’s former lawyer

Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:32 pm to
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2572 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

There's still client confidentiality.


Negative ghost rider. Not atty-privilege, no atty-client confidentiality.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99769 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Negative ghost rider. Not atty-privilege, no atty-client confidentiality.


Incorrect.

Privilege is an evidentiary exception created by statute that can (as was in this case) be determined not to apply. That does not mean the communication is not still subject to the confidentiality requirements of Rule 1.6.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram