Started By
Message

re: Judge rules no attorney-client privilege for Nathan Wade’s former lawyer

Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:08 pm to
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
26191 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:08 pm to


So they can likely re-examine Miss Willis and Mr Wade. Dis gonna be good.


Edit: although it would be fun, probably not the best strategy. She’s already hung her self. No need to let her testify more.
This post was edited on 2/26/24 at 6:10 pm
Posted by Big Jim Slade
Member since Oct 2016
4962 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

So they can likely re-examine Miss Willis and Mr Wade. Dis gonna be good.


Assuming it shows they lied, their lies are on the record. No need to call them back to give them a new chance to explain things or testify that they misunderstood the original question. Stick with the lie and they’ve been successfully impeached.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96817 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:30 pm to
Having him testify to establish perjury by Dumb and Dumber is enough.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45551 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

So they can likely re-examine Miss Willis and Mr Wade. Dis gonna be good. Edit: although it would be fun, probably not the best strategy. She’s already hung her self. No need to let her testify more.


Let’s go ahead and draft the perjury charge sheet.
Posted by BHTiger
Charleston
Member since Dec 2017
5165 posts
Posted on 2/26/24 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Edit: although it would be fun, probably not the best strategy. She’s already hung her self. No need to let her testify more.


She will be unhinged and it would be great. The blonde chick will have her screaming racism and the old guy will have her in tears.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram