Started By
Message

re: In just a few years, the average retiree will be receiving 37% more in SS than he paid in

Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:51 am to
Posted by Marquesa
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2020
1546 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:51 am to
This is lying with statistics. If I had put all the money that went to SS into a safe investment, like bonds - my money would have grown many times over. I"ve heard a rule of thumb that invested money doubles every 7 years on aveage. I've been giving money to SS for 50 years. So my money should have doubled 7 times when you average it all out. It would be Super Modest to say I and my employer have given 5K a year over all that time. That first 5K would have become 10, then 20, then 40, then 80, then 160, then 320, then 640. And that's just the first 5K. So tell me again how I'm gong to get more than I deserve at 30K year payout?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425252 posts
Posted on 2/25/24 at 7:58 am to
quote:

This is lying with statistics. If I had put all the money that went to SS into a safe investment, like bonds - my money would have grown many times over. I"ve heard a rule of thumb that invested money doubles every 7 years on aveage. I've been giving money to SS for 50 years. So my money should have doubled 7 times

Now do the 75-85% of people who will receive SS who would have $0 invested if it were up to them. Your theorized returns pale in comparison to their theorized losses. That's why this "efficient investor" model is silly when describing a welfare program like SS.

The whole point of SS is security over efficiency.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram