Started By
Message

re: So-called "moon landing"

Posted on 2/21/24 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Member since Sep 2003
125553 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

It's impossible for man to fly to the moon in a rocket. 50 years later with 1 million times the technology
No dipshit, it is nowhere near "impossible"

At the time, it was extraordinarily expensive, risky and ... eventually ... unnecessary.

How risky? Of the 36 Apollo mission astronauts - Apollo 1, 7-17, three were cooked alive. Three miraculously survived a mid-space capsule explosion, and there were several other near misses. So the fatality incidence was > 8% and could very easily have been double that.


As with the A-Bomb, our applied science in that era was decades ahead of the world. The Soviets stole our materials to close the gap. China remained 20 yrs behind.
What's changed? The concept of an eventual moonbase and Mars staging.

Perhaps your next denial should address the Hindenburg disaster? It must never have occurred because nothing the size of the Hindenburg has been built since. Right?




I M P O S S I B L E !
Posted by saintsfan1977
West Monroe, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
8178 posts
Posted on 2/21/24 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

At the time, it was extraordinarily expensive


We print money like newspapers. No such thing as expensive when it comes to government agencies.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
37048 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 6:45 am to
quote:

next denial should address the Hindenburg disaster? It must never have occurred because nothing the size of the Hindenburg has been built since. Right?


How do we know it was really that big? Are we taking their word for it? It does seem a bit extreme when you compare it to the others.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram