Started By
Message

re: Infield fly rule

Posted on 2/18/24 at 3:51 pm to
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
8550 posts
Posted on 2/18/24 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

An argument would be, “the infield fly rule should be eliminated because . . .”


Ok, the infield fly rule should be eliminated because it would potentially penalize a team for hitting into a pop-up and reward the team that induced it and it would provide excitement to the game without drastically changing the fabric of the game, such as lowering the mound and introducing the DH did. It would also take the onus off the umpire to make an often subjective decision on when to apply the rule.

quote:

an argument would be the infield fly rule protects the baserunners because otherwise they would have no chance at either advancing or returning to base safely.


They would have a chance though. The defense still has to let the ball drop, cover a base, and make two decent throws. Much like they are required to do on a normal double play ball. In fact, one could argue that a team that laces a hard hit ball at the SS with a runner on first is more often penalized by the outcome than the team that hits a weak pop-up to the shortstop in the same situation.

I am not saying its a valid enough argument to make the rule change, and honestly, it isn't broke so why fix it probably makes the most sense here, but lets not pretend there isn't at least some validity to eliminating the rule.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36535 posts
Posted on 2/18/24 at 4:04 pm to
Without the infield fly rule it would be chaos.
You could even see triple play when the bases are loaded. The rule is as common sense rule and it would be crazy to change it up.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
6419 posts
Posted on 2/18/24 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

I am not saying its a valid enough argument to make the rule change, and honestly, it isn't broke so why fix it probably makes the most sense here, but lets not pretend there isn't at least some validity to eliminating the rule.


Except the rule was specifically implemented because defenders were deliberately not making a play on the ball to force runners to advance, generating an easy double play.

Why would we assume that players 100 years ago were more capable of making the throw than modern players.

Arguing to remove a rule that was put in place to prevent an obvious issue makes no sense. Let’s eliminate the infield fly and also eliminate the tag up requirement.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram