- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gafford is going to be this year's Lakers trades
Posted on 2/13/24 at 6:43 am to ghost2most
Posted on 2/13/24 at 6:43 am to ghost2most
quote:
Gafford is going to be this year's Lakers trades
You would rather have Beasley and Vanderbilt and about $20 million more in salary than having Hawkins? Because that’s what I’m hearing. And that’s if you decided to keep Beasley, which the Lakers didn’t because he wasn’t very good for them and would have been expensive to resign.
So would you trade Hawkins for Vanderbilt?
This post was edited on 2/13/24 at 6:44 am
1
Posted on 2/13/24 at 7:22 am to TigerinATL
quote:
You would rather have Beasley and Vanderbilt and about $20 million more in salary than having Hawkins? Because that’s what I’m hearing. And that’s if you decided to keep Beasley, which the Lakers didn’t because he wasn’t very good for them and would have been expensive to resign.
So would you trade Hawkins for Vanderbilt?
I'm not sure I would have made a trade for Gafford, although I have in the past said he's a guy I wanted.
The point I'm making is that this is a trade that will propel the Mavs upward just like last year's trades did the Lakers.
Short-term it's a win for the Mavs just like it was for the Lakers. Long-term, probably not.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News