Started By
Message

re: For those that believe the NFL is rigged, what would it take to convince you otherwise?

Posted on 2/14/24 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by JodyPlauche
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
8908 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 2:27 pm to
So if the NFL wants the Rams in the Super Bowl they can ignore pass interference.

If they want Tom Brady to win one his 1st year without CBB...they can do it.

If they want the Chief's to win back to back they can.

So at this point...y'all are as annoying as Pro-Lifers...and nothing is going to change your mind.

quote:

Although there are few cases on point, in general in New Jersey, a “ticket is to be regarded as a mere license, for the revocation of which before the holder has actually been given his seat, and has taken it, the only remedy is in assumpsit for a breach of the contract.” Shubert v. Nixon Amusement Co., 83 N.J.L. 101, 105 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1912). As the language of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Shubert suggests, there may be a remedy where a ticket has not been honored, but there is no remedy at law where the ticket-holder has been granted admission and subsequently complains about the quality, or here, the “honesty,” of the conduct of the event. This principle has also been recognized by courts in cases such as In re 2005 United States Grand Prix and Castillo v. Tyson, and this Court follows the lead of those decisions.
This post was edited on 2/14/24 at 2:41 pm
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
5801 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Although there are few cases on point, in general in New Jersey, a “ticket is to be regarded as a mere license, for the revocation of which before the holder has actually been given his seat, and has taken it, the only remedy is in assumpsit for a breach of the contract.” Shubert v. Nixon Amusement Co., 83 N.J.L. 101, 105 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1912). As the language of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Shubert suggests, there may be a remedy where a ticket has not been honored, but there is no remedy at law where the ticket-holder has been granted admission and subsequently complains about the quality, or here, the “honesty,” of the conduct of the event. This principle has also been recognized by courts in cases such as In re 2005 United States Grand Prix and Castillo v. Tyson, and this Court follows the lead of those decisions.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram