- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: For those that believe the NFL is rigged, what would it take to convince you otherwise?
Posted on 2/14/24 at 2:27 pm to JodyPlauche
Posted on 2/14/24 at 2:27 pm to JodyPlauche
So if the NFL wants the Rams in the Super Bowl they can ignore pass interference.
If they want Tom Brady to win one his 1st year without CBB...they can do it.
If they want the Chief's to win back to back they can.
So at this point...y'all are as annoying as Pro-Lifers...and nothing is going to change your mind.
If they want Tom Brady to win one his 1st year without CBB...they can do it.
If they want the Chief's to win back to back they can.
So at this point...y'all are as annoying as Pro-Lifers...and nothing is going to change your mind.
quote:
Although there are few cases on point, in general in New Jersey, a “ticket is to be regarded as a mere license, for the revocation of which before the holder has actually been given his seat, and has taken it, the only remedy is in assumpsit for a breach of the contract.” Shubert v. Nixon Amusement Co., 83 N.J.L. 101, 105 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1912). As the language of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Shubert suggests, there may be a remedy where a ticket has not been honored, but there is no remedy at law where the ticket-holder has been granted admission and subsequently complains about the quality, or here, the “honesty,” of the conduct of the event. This principle has also been recognized by courts in cases such as In re 2005 United States Grand Prix and Castillo v. Tyson, and this Court follows the lead of those decisions.
This post was edited on 2/14/24 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 2/15/24 at 7:22 am to JodyPlauche
quote:
Although there are few cases on point, in general in New Jersey, a “ticket is to be regarded as a mere license, for the revocation of which before the holder has actually been given his seat, and has taken it, the only remedy is in assumpsit for a breach of the contract.” Shubert v. Nixon Amusement Co., 83 N.J.L. 101, 105 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1912). As the language of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Shubert suggests, there may be a remedy where a ticket has not been honored, but there is no remedy at law where the ticket-holder has been granted admission and subsequently complains about the quality, or here, the “honesty,” of the conduct of the event. This principle has also been recognized by courts in cases such as In re 2005 United States Grand Prix and Castillo v. Tyson, and this Court follows the lead of those decisions.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News