- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
4
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:20 am to PrecedentedTimes
quote:This should be one of those few decisions.
Guarantee there’ll be at least one dissent. Few decisions are ever unanimous
A single state shouldn’t get to decide who can run in a FEDERAL election.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 10:21 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:20 am to PrecedentedTimes
Just because they vote 9-0 doesn’t mean it won’t be a majority decision and a ton of concurrencies.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:23 am to PrecedentedTimes
quote:
Guarantee there’ll be at least one dissent.
I see your one, and raise you two more.
Jackson
Sotomayor
Roberts or Kagan (Roberts most likely)
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:31 am to PrecedentedTimes
quote:
Guarantee there’ll be at least one dissent. Few decisions are ever unanimous
Few major decisions are, most end up being 9-0 or 8-1
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News