- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS oral arguments on Trump vs Colorado
Posted on 2/8/24 at 3:05 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 2/8/24 at 3:05 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Those people were unlawfully attempting to interfere with the lawful transfer of power at the very top of the government.
Says who? There is no way to conclusively prove your statement.
I understand that is your opinion, but that doesn't make it fact.
I thought the legal system was based on provable facts?
quote:
in·sur·rec·tion
noun
a violent uprising against an authority or government.
The only violence was committed by the idiot cop who shot a unarmed woman who was climbing thru a window and posed no threat to anyone.
It's obvious the "insurrectionist" had no plan. There was no cohesive or strategic movement of people that would indicate a preplanned "insurrection".
The lack of such reveals what it actually was, a demonstration in which some overreacted and transgressed, much different than an insurrection.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 3:22 pm to lake chuck fan
I'm not in favor of calling the riot (Trump's lawyer used that word this morning) an insurrection.
But,
If you ignore the violence committed against the Capitol police and the damage to windows and doors to gain entry.
As one Justice asked Trump's lawyer, so if it's chaotic it cannot be an insurrection?
I think people were there for a variety of reasons, and many of them probably weren't sure why they were there. Some of them were there to encourage Republicans to question the Electoral ballots. And evidence suggests some of them were sent there to try to delay the entire process.
I mean, I don't think it was an insurrection, but let's not sugar coat it and place all negative actions on the FBI.
But,
quote:
The only violence was committed by the idiot cop who shot a unarmed woman
If you ignore the violence committed against the Capitol police and the damage to windows and doors to gain entry.
quote:
It's obvious the "insurrectionist" had no plan. There was no cohesive or strategic movement of people that would indicate a preplanned "insurrection".
As one Justice asked Trump's lawyer, so if it's chaotic it cannot be an insurrection?
I think people were there for a variety of reasons, and many of them probably weren't sure why they were there. Some of them were there to encourage Republicans to question the Electoral ballots. And evidence suggests some of them were sent there to try to delay the entire process.
I mean, I don't think it was an insurrection, but let's not sugar coat it and place all negative actions on the FBI.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 7:22 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
There is no way to conclusively prove your statement.
They entered the Capitol when it was closed to the public with the stated intention to “stop the steal”.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)