Or maybe it is ok to not be an over-reactionary bitch and support the guy who is in year fricking 2 of a rebuild? Jesus. If this was year 4, then fine.

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by Madking

Member since Apr 2016

48067 posts

Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:11 pm to LSUGrad9295

Maybe if you knew what you were watching you’d understand that we could wait until year 7 and he’s still not going to turn us into a winning program.

This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:13 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by DeathByTossDive225

Baton Rouge

Member since Sep 2019

3953 posts

Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:24 pm to LSUGrad9295

quote:
over-reactionary

I think that’s putting it lightly tbh. Imagine McMahon builds something here. Imagine the improvement from this year to next is equivalent to the improvement from last year to this year.

I’m trying to imagine how these posters would cope. They may claim to want to see LSU succeed, but idk… feels like they just wanna be right.

This post was edited on 2/7/24 at 10:26 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Old Money

Member since Sep 2012

36551 posts

Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:19 am to LSUGrad9295

quote:
Or maybe it is ok to not be an over-reactionary bitch and support the guy who is in year fricking 2 of a rebuild? Jesus. If this was year 4, then fine.

He just needs 5 years, don’t worry baws!

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by tiger25

Alabama

Member since Nov 2009

2200 posts

Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:45 am to LSUGrad9295

quote:
Or maybe it is ok to not be an over-reactionary bitch and support the guy who is in year fricking 2 of a rebuild? Jesus. If this was year 4, then fine

In today's day and age of college athletics, especially with how much more turnover there is in basketball compared to football or baseball, how are we still talking about giving a guy 4 years in a rebuild?

The acceptance of going from 2 wins for 4 wins is laughable.

1 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board