quote:
That power is given to Mayorkas who can make any determination he wants by simple fiat.

And the only court that anyone can challenge any concerns regarding immigration is shifted to DC via this legislation.

Yea, frick your “moderate” stance.

How do you propose handling the 'asylum seekers'?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Scruffy

Kansas City

Member since Jul 2011

72203 posts

Posted on 2/6/24 at 11:46 am to WildTchoupitoulas

quote:
How do you propose handling the 'asylum seekers'?

Make them stay in Mexico until a thorough background check is completed with rigid qualifications limited to direct governmental oppression that is probable and provable.

Anyone who crosses the border illegally is officially barred from the process.

If they are actually seeking asylum, they can go through proper channels.

Giving absolute power to the head of DHS to blindly grant asylum is asinine.

Especially when it is a politically appointed position.

Forcing all immigration complaints to be heard in DC courts just proves this is a political ploy.

Remove the funding for Israel/Gaza and Ukraine from the bill.

Build a wall.

Punish any business owner who hires illegally.

This post was edited on 2/6/24 at 11:51 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by minister of truth

Somewhere new for 6-12 months

Member since May 2022

1168 posts

Posted on 2/6/24 at 11:48 am to WildTchoupitoulas

now you've narrowed down your argument to asylum seekers as if that is a significant factor in the millions coming across the border. it's a small fraction of the invasion and can be handled after control of the border has been obtained. makes no sense to do nothing or enact something that's even worse for the "asylum seekers". weak progressive distraction

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board