Started By
Message

re: Cathy Wood Rips the Delaware Court Finding Voiding Musk's $56B TSLA Compensation

Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:27 am to
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
12107 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:27 am to
Its a publicly traded company, its not a private company.




Im still not sure how the judge CAN do this, but its an important distinction
Posted by FlyingPelican
St. George (someday)
Member since Sep 2021
162 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Its a publicly traded company, its not a private company.

You too are missing a vital distinction. Tesla may be publicly traded, it is not a nationalized company.

While Tesla may be traded through a public exchange, the shares are held by the private sector (individuals and corporations--and don't try to weasel in an exception for government sector retirement plans).

The federal judge may be able to squash the compensation package for the CEO of Amtrac or the USPS (quasi-public entities), a corporation (like Tesla) doesn't become a subsidiary of the US Government just because the stock is traded on the NYSE or NASDAQ.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56914 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Its a publicly traded company, its not a private company.



Semantics confuses a lot of people
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10674 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:52 am to
When is say private it meant not a government entity
Posted by fisherscatfan
Indianapolis
Member since Sep 2020
517 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 9:28 am to
Publicly traded but not government owned, therefore it is private. CEO compensation is voted on by shareholders but it is only an advisory vote that is non binding. So even if the shareholders voted no, the Board doesn’t have to follow, although unwise.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram