- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Name me one thing positive Willie Green has done as coach?
Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:01 am to TigerinATL
Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:01 am to TigerinATL
quote:He's not a negative asset 1 year from now.
But he won't be a negative asset assuming he stays healthy.
He's a negative asset the moment he signs a new max deal.
quote:It was always understood that CJ would net something of value in return.
People said the same thing about CJ, in fact he was widely viewed as a negative contract, yet there was a bidding war for him and he still got a 1st for Portland despite being a "negative asset".
The question was how much. And the only CJ/negative asset discussion I recall was his extension, not during his trade.
Posted on 2/5/24 at 11:05 am to shel311
quote:
He's a negative asset the moment he signs a new max deal.
Pelsmageddon would be Ingram staying like this all season, cranks it up in the playoffs, we make the 2nd round and lose like 4-1, then Griff using that to justify the max for Ingram.
Posted on 2/5/24 at 12:55 pm to shel311
quote:
He's a negative asset the moment he signs a new max deal.
If Lavine were healthy do you believe he is a negative asset? I was wrong, he's already started his new extension, $37 million this year and $49 in 2026-27. Before his season was derailed by injuries he was talked up as one of the players the Lakers would target. I didn't really see people talking about him as a negative contract like I did with CJ.
quote:
It was always understood that CJ would net something of value in return.
Maybe amongst the 30 GMs in the league, but I know the NBA twitter chatter seemed to view him very negatively because of his contract and decline in play due to a few injury plagued seasons. I know when he was kicked around here as a possible target way before that trade deadline, people talked about not wanting him and needing assets to take him.
However, my basic theme that I'm trying to get across is "Be careful what you wish for" and "The grass isn't always greener." Saying it's time to trade a player or fire a coach is one thing, Finding a replacement that's an actual improvement is another. If your reasoning is "Anything is better than this." that's basically asking the basketball gods to smite you, and the rest of us by extension. And I'm not saying that's your reasoning, just speaking generally because there are a lot of people, including myself, that don't think BI is going to work out long term with Zion.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 12:59 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)