- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2023 LSU WBB won Natty but lost nearly $8M
Posted on 1/29/24 at 11:43 am to DalenSA
Posted on 1/29/24 at 11:43 am to DalenSA
And the LSU athletic department as a whole made frick you money because of its TV deal. Losing $8m is not that big of a deal, especially considering what they are paying Kim.
Posted on 1/29/24 at 11:44 am to Broski
I must not understand, it said the department lost 4 mil, how is the frick you money not calculated in that
Posted on 1/29/24 at 11:45 am to Broski
quote:
Losing $8m is not that big of a deal, especially considering what they are paying Kim.
Her fundraising efforts for facilities will more than pay for any year over year deficits her sport runs.
And it will positively impact MBB, VB, and GYM at least, in addition to WBB.
Posted on 1/29/24 at 11:46 am to Broski
quote:
LSU’s athletic department found that the organization operated with a nearly $4 million deficit last year
quote:
broski: And the LSU athletic department as a whole made frick you money
![](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/273/096/51c.gif)
Posted on 1/29/24 at 9:30 pm to Broski
quote:
And the LSU athletic department as a whole made frick you money because of its TV deal. Losing $8m is not that big of a deal, especially considering what they are paying Kim.
Plus the championship run was great PR. We had an audience of 10 million for the final. So basically $7.8 million for a two-hour commercial. Plus the games leading up to it and the chatter afterward.
Posted on 1/29/24 at 9:39 pm to Broski
quote:
And the LSU athletic department as a whole made frick you money because of its TV deal. Losing $8m is not that big of a deal, especially considering what they are paying Kim.
What is your basis for saying this? The athletic department generates huge revenues, but I know from work done for LSU and other universities that LSU's athletic department (and most athletic departments) either lose money or make a very modest amount of money. We have made money in the past, but the returns are below market on the revenue invested.
It may be that successful athletic programs drive enrollment and donations to the general fund. So, I suppose what you say is possible in some indirect sense, but I don't know of anyone who has done the math on that. And it's certainly not the case that the athletic program is making a bunch of under-the-table money that we're not reporting.
Generally, schools spend the money because they want to win and raise the school's profile. They're not spending money on coaches and infrastructure because they're going to make a bunch of profit.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)