- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas AG Ken Paxton On Election Night 2020: "Have you ever seen that before? Ever?"
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:18 pm to Flats
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:18 pm to Flats
quote:
It may not be considered proof
Fine.
Where's the proof? It's been 3 years of questioning the results, there should be proof by now. I have seen none, just all of this circumstantial evidence. I remain unconvinced.
Yes, it was a fricked up election, but it can all be explained in the context of the COVID restrictions and unlawful changes to voting laws that allowed for more absentee/mail-in voting. There doesn't appear to be proof of any conspiracy.
3
Posted on 1/24/24 at 12:22 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Where's the proof?
Again, what constitutes proof is subjective. I've seen enough to be convinced that organized illegal harvesting was the difference in Georgia at a minimum, almost certainly other states as well. If you want to deny that you can; some people think OJ didn't kill Nicole. There never was and never will be enough evidence for them to consider that evidence "proof".
You're the only person who knows why your threshold is what it is.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 1:07 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I remain unconvinced.
If you remain unconvinced at this point, still denying that proof/evidence (whatever your want to refer to it as) of fraud exists, you're NEVER going to be convinced. There is a mountain of evidence and proof... confirmed fraud... that exists. Just because your preferred media sources and pundits refuse to acknowledge it or outright lie about that doesn't mean they are correct. Even with massive proof staring you and millions in the face, you still refuse to believe it. Pathetic.
This post was edited on 1/24/24 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 1/24/24 at 3:38 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
but it can all be explained in the context of the COVID restrictions and unlawful changes to voting laws that allowed for more absentee/mail-in voting.
No. It can’t.
Do you think 90%+ of registered Wisconsin voters voted?
So you think 95% of eligible voters voted?
And how hilarious that there’s a 5% overage of registered versus eligible voters? Pretty fricking hilarious.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News