Started By
Message

re: Kentucky rep sponsors kissing cousins bill

Posted on 1/18/24 at 10:02 pm to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
30186 posts
Posted on 1/18/24 at 10:02 pm to
Sounds like it was a mistake, according to Nick Wilson :

quote:

I filed HB 269 yesterday. The purpose of the bill is to add “sexual contact” to the incest statute. Currently, incest only applies in cases of intercourse. So sexual touching/groping by uncles, stepdads or anyone with a familial relationship is not included in incest. My bill makes that kind of sexual contact a Class D Felony, unless the victim is under the age of 12, then it increases the penalty to a Class C Felony. During the drafting process, there was an inadvertent change, which struck “first cousins” from the list of relationships included under the incest statute, and I failed to add it back in. During today’s session, I will withdraw HB 269 and refile a bill with the “first cousin” language intact. The fact that I was able to file a bill, catch the mistake, withdraw the bill and refile within a 24 hour period shows that we have a good system. This is a bill to combat a problem of familial and cyclical abuse that transcends generations of Kentuckians. I understand that I made a mistake, but I sincerely hope my mistake doesn’t hurt the chances of the corrected version of the bill. It is a good bill, and I hope it will get a second chance.
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 10:03 pm
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
10983 posts
Posted on 1/18/24 at 10:23 pm to
Even if it was an honest mistake, it’s still fricking hilarious and he’ll never live it down.

Almost makes me wish I knew him, would never stop giving him shite, amirite?
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 10:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram