Started By
Message

re: Man charged with recording sexual acts of Madison Brooks

Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:13 am to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84460 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:13 am to
You're the one that seems to know all the evidence the DA has. But sure deflect deflect deflect. It's what you do best.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96364 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 10:15 am to
quote:

You're the one that seems to know all the evidence the DA has. But sure deflect deflect deflect.
what we know

The DNA came back and did not have any of the defendants inside of brooks

Only trace DNA was found near the pelvic region of brooks

Video shows brooks running towards the defendants and getting in their car

Without the original testimony, please do tell what the prosecution would have used to press these charges? They would only have her BAC, which there is no legal limit for establishing consent

The original testimony is DAMNING though. It exists, and thankfully it does
This post was edited on 1/12/24 at 10:18 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram