Started By
Message

re: Trump’s Boldest Argument Yet: Immunity From Prosecution for Assassinations

Posted on 1/11/24 at 8:30 am to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68842 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Immunity for Presidential acts


That's the other test that has been left out by discussing immunity in a vacuum. The premise of the immunity is that the action done had at some relation to the duties of the office, and I think the relation can be very liberally construed. You only need to get close.
Posted by MAADFACTS
Member since Jul 2021
1280 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 8:46 am to
quote:

That's the other test that has been left out by discussing immunity in a vacuum. The premise of the immunity is that the action done had at some relation to the duties of the office, and I think the relation can be very liberally construed. You only need to get close.


Didn’t the Clinton team try and make the argument that he was protected from the allegations brought against him by Paula Jones, and didn’t the Supreme Court agree? Like it’s absolute bullshite, but liberal courts did set that stupid precedent
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram