- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court agrees to review Trump’s Colorado ballot ban in historic case
Posted on 1/6/24 at 2:27 pm to Dday63
Posted on 1/6/24 at 2:27 pm to Dday63
quote:
Just say, "Yes, I believe 'office under the United Ststes' only applies to appointed positions, and therefore the emoluments clause and the impeachment disqualification clause do not apply to any elected officials." Why make everyone play guessing games?
Well for starters I didn’t say anything about the emoluments clause. And I certainly don’t believe that neither clause applies to elected officials. I have no earthly idea where that even came from.
I’ve been perfectly clear that POTUS is NOT an “officer of the United States” per SCOTUS jurisprudence.
What in my post did you find to be cryptic? I was being accusatory, as you are undoubtedly aware of the difference in wording between holding “office under the United States “ and being an “officer of the United States”.
You’re just choosing to ignore it.
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 2:28 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News