Started By
Message

re: NIL restrictions

Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:58 pm to
Posted by SiriusBraveFan
Member since Nov 2014
655 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:58 pm to
I feel like one thing is that NIL deals or offers should not be allowed before a player signs to attend a particular college. The whole point of NIL was supposed to be for the players to get compensated while in school for things such as being in a commercial or sign autographs or sell shirts etc. Not supposed to be "hey come to school here and I'll give you $100,000.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19176 posts
Posted on 1/2/24 at 6:19 pm to
NIL simply isn’t sustainable. When Nike or Gatorade pay a professional athlete for endorsing their brand, there’s typically an ad campaign behind them to generate a return on the investment. Of all these NIL deals, show me how everyone throwing money at these kids is getting a return on their investment. A select few have ended up decent AD campaigns but that’s the exception. I’m sure there’s a little money in autographs but not to the extent that is being poured into these deals.

The real money is in the tv deals. The first conference to fundamentally understand this and cut their students athletes in on it is going to win the realignment war. All the stupidity that comes with the NIL will disappear.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram