- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Early Signing Period?
Posted on 12/9/08 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 12/9/08 at 5:23 pm
I'm putting together a paper weighing the pros and cons of having an early signing period for football. This would be IMPOSSIBLE over on the rant, but I'm at least hoping to get some 3rd party ideas that I havent thought about. Let the brainstorming begin...
Thanks in advance for meaningful contributions
Thanks in advance for meaningful contributions
Posted on 12/9/08 at 5:31 pm to giolsutiger
early signing as in letting them sign a paper early or as in enrolling early?
Posted on 12/9/08 at 5:32 pm to giolsutiger
pros: none
cons: kids make more mistakes
cons: kids make more mistakes
Posted on 12/9/08 at 5:56 pm to LSU32
Pros -
It takes the pressure of recruiting off of a kid that knows where he wants to go.
Helps kids that commit early focus on their football and basketball seasons.
Most importantly, it allows kids to focus on the classroom. There won't be the distraction of taking officials, meetings with coaches during classes, and phone calls at night.
Could lead to a few more kids being able to avoid JUCO or Hargrave.
It also allows coaches to get a commit and get a better understanding of who will and won't be in their class.
They won't have to continue leading kids on. Coaches wouldn't have to worry about covering their rear ends are if one of their committed kids de-commit leaving a void in the class.
Coaches could focus on who they really want, letting kids that likely wouldn't get a scholarship to look about instead of waiting for that one scholarship.
Cons -
many kids will commit and then want to bail if something changes but they would have signed the letter of intent.
What would be the punishment for a kid refusing to go to a school when they already signed a letter of intent?
Hold him out a year when other kids haven't committed yet?
P.S. - There was a huge article on this issue in ESPN mag (or SI) about two years ago. I'm sure it is archived on one of their websites.
It takes the pressure of recruiting off of a kid that knows where he wants to go.
Helps kids that commit early focus on their football and basketball seasons.
Most importantly, it allows kids to focus on the classroom. There won't be the distraction of taking officials, meetings with coaches during classes, and phone calls at night.
Could lead to a few more kids being able to avoid JUCO or Hargrave.
It also allows coaches to get a commit and get a better understanding of who will and won't be in their class.
They won't have to continue leading kids on. Coaches wouldn't have to worry about covering their rear ends are if one of their committed kids de-commit leaving a void in the class.
Coaches could focus on who they really want, letting kids that likely wouldn't get a scholarship to look about instead of waiting for that one scholarship.
Cons -
many kids will commit and then want to bail if something changes but they would have signed the letter of intent.
What would be the punishment for a kid refusing to go to a school when they already signed a letter of intent?
Hold him out a year when other kids haven't committed yet?
P.S. - There was a huge article on this issue in ESPN mag (or SI) about two years ago. I'm sure it is archived on one of their websites.
This post was edited on 12/9/08 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 12/9/08 at 6:04 pm to stewie
Con: Kid signs L.O.I., and there is a coaching change.
Posted on 12/9/08 at 7:58 pm to Redfish2010
quote:
early signing as in letting them sign a paper early or as in enrolling early?
As in being able to sign an NLI during an early signing period (prior to the regular signing period beginning in February).
Posted on 12/9/08 at 8:00 pm to stewie
quote:
stewie
Thanks! I'll go look for that article now.
Posted on 12/9/08 at 10:28 pm to giolsutiger
Can't remember who wrote that article or the title, I just remember reading it while sitting on a stationary bike during rehab from a knee surgery.
It has a few comments from Kyle Wright. He talked about his recruitment and how he wished he could signed earlier because dealing with coaches continuing to call and visit when he had been committed to UM for months. It had a few other quotes from high school and college players about the pros and cons, etc.
Sorry I couldn't help more,
Check out collegefootballnews.com, I'm sure they have a bunch of stuff on the issue of early signing day.
It has a few comments from Kyle Wright. He talked about his recruitment and how he wished he could signed earlier because dealing with coaches continuing to call and visit when he had been committed to UM for months. It had a few other quotes from high school and college players about the pros and cons, etc.
Sorry I couldn't help more,
Check out collegefootballnews.com, I'm sure they have a bunch of stuff on the issue of early signing day.
This post was edited on 12/9/08 at 10:29 pm
Popular
Back to top
2





