Uh...why?

Colorado actually had a trial and some due process for findings of fact, using actual state election law as a backbone (opening up potential Federalism issues with current USSC state election law and the 14A).

If you actually want the possibility for a ruling with any actual discussion of the merits in the law then I don't see why you'd ever think the Maine case gives you a better opponent than the Colorado case. They're way too many ways for them to just get rid of the main case without even touching the merits or the 14th.

I think ultimately they say Congress has to clarify this but also nuke the Colorado opinion by saying this clause doesn't apply to the President.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by RedHog260

Member since Oct 2023

532 posts

Posted on 1/2/24 at 5:41 pm to SlowFlowPro

quote:
Uh...why?

Colorado actually had a trial and some due process for findings of fact, using actual state election law as a backbone (opening up potential Federalism issues with current USSC state election law and the 14A).

I can only think you and so many other leftist morons are well morons. Have you read the 14th amendment? All of it? Section 5? And by the way what insurrection? You appear like most dumbazz leftists, a leaky tampon.

Section 5 Enforcement

The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

If you actually want the possibility for a ruling with any actual discussion of the merits in the law then I don't see why you'd ever think the Maine case gives you a better opponent than the Colorado case. They're way too many ways for them to just get rid of the main case without even touching the merits or the 14th.

I think ultimately they say Congress has to clarify this but also nuke the Colorado opinion by saying this clause doesn't apply to the President.