Started By
Message

re: Haley declines to say slavery was cause of Civil War

Posted on 12/28/23 at 8:45 am to
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
7429 posts
Posted on 12/28/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Well maybe they shouldn’t have attacked first


This statement ^^^ is a cop out and by doing so have admitted that secession was in part for slavery and the war was not. You are trying to shift the narrative.

This post was edited on 12/28/23 at 8:48 am
Posted by rmnldr
Member since Oct 2013
38249 posts
Posted on 12/28/23 at 8:51 am to
quote:

This statement ^^^ is a cop out and by doing so have admitted that secession was in part for slavery and the war was not. You are trying to shift the narrative.



A cop out?

This is ridiculous.

You’re willing to agree that secession was about slavery.

But everything else wasn’t?

So without secession (which was about slavery) you don’t have a Fort Sumter attack. You get that right? You don’t have a civil war either. Therefore, slavery caused the civil war.

That’s not saying that every single man that fought in the war fought because of slavery. Just like how not every German soldier fought for the extermination of the undermensch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram