- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Raffensperger refusing to testify about Georgia's voting machines
Posted on 12/27/23 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/27/23 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
For this argument, that's fine. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but to discuss 2020, you have to do the 3 things I posted about.
You always want to avoid the actual holes in the system.
There’s no tracking of changes made by user.
When ballots are not automatically adjudicated, a user can go in and determine the voters intent, print out the new ballot with the “voters intent” and replace the original ballot with the new adjudicated ballot.
None of this is tracked by user.
There is some indication that ballots which did not adjudicate can be adjudicated by batch processes. Try to let that sink in. Thus the clamor for the original ballot images.
This would not be unacceptable security for a voting system for a high school election. Let alone a state-wide federal election.
That’s to say nothing of software updates and timing, fractional voting possibilities, lack of ongoing certification of machines and internet connectivity.
This post was edited on 12/27/23 at 1:33 pm
2
Posted on 12/27/23 at 2:57 pm to the808bass
quote:
There’s no tracking of changes made by user.
Cardinal rule type of flaw
quote:
When ballots are not automatically adjudicated, a user can go in and determine the voters intent, print out the new ballot with the “voters intent” and replace the original ballot with the new adjudicated ballot.
Even an attorney should be able to see the problem with that
quote:
There is some indication that ballots which did not adjudicate can be adjudicated by batch processes. Try to let that sink in. Thus the clamor for the original ballot images.
This brings in mass manipulation possibilities. It would be instant disqualification of a security audit for approval to be used.
quote:
This would not be unacceptable security for a voting system for a high school election. Let alone a state-wide federal election.
It violates almost every state law regarding the voting equipment.
quote:
That’s to say nothing of software updates and timing, fractional voting possibilities, lack of ongoing certification of machines and internet connectivity.
You also didn't mention that the physical audit of ballots doesn't match the soft ballot count...and that some ballot images are missing...and some ballots are missing...and that of the few ballot image they've seen they found duplicate ballots.
SFP knows these things. He tries to focus on the "pillow man" because he thinks it allows him to ignore it.
Posted on 12/27/23 at 3:21 pm to the808bass
quote:
You always want to avoid the actual holes in the system.
Holes in the system are irrelevant for purposes of discussing 2020 if they weren't exploited.
What people are asking for is actual evidence of the alleged fraud from 2020. It's been 3 years and we're still waiting.
I will concede any point about potential security flaw you want, but it is still irrelevant to the discussion until you give evidence of how that security flaw was exploited, where, the effects, etc.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News