Started By
Message

re: EvangelicalBible.com with a boom today

Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:30 pm to
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59752 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

Which is why I cited none of that in my rationale for accepting the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth


So to which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring? I don’t think there are any.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
114063 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring?


If you need contemporary references to prove people existed, just chuck your history books into the trash.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
62296 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

So to which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring?

I'm referencing the usual sources that are cited. Josephus's Antiquities of the Jews, Tacitus's Annals, a letter from Pliny the Younger, the Roman biographer Suetonius, the authentic letters of Paul (1 Thessalonians, Galatians, 1 Corinthians, Philippians, Philemon, 2 Corinthian and Romans) where he claims that he personally knew James the Just and Peter the Apostle, both of whom claim to have known Jesus, and the lost Q document, which forms the basis for the sayings of Jesus in the Synoptics. These, to me, are about as compelling an argument as we're likely to find when searching for proof of anyone's existence from that time and place.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 10:38 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram