- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: EvangelicalBible.com with a boom today
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:30 pm to L.A.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:30 pm to L.A.
quote:
Which is why I cited none of that in my rationale for accepting the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth
So to which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring? I don’t think there are any.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:54 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring?
If you need contemporary references to prove people existed, just chuck your history books into the trash.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 10:15 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
So to which “contemporary” references to Jesus were you referring?
I'm referencing the usual sources that are cited. Josephus's Antiquities of the Jews, Tacitus's Annals, a letter from Pliny the Younger, the Roman biographer Suetonius, the authentic letters of Paul (1 Thessalonians, Galatians, 1 Corinthians, Philippians, Philemon, 2 Corinthian and Romans) where he claims that he personally knew James the Just and Peter the Apostle, both of whom claim to have known Jesus, and the lost Q document, which forms the basis for the sayings of Jesus in the Synoptics. These, to me, are about as compelling an argument as we're likely to find when searching for proof of anyone's existence from that time and place.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 10:38 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News