Started By
Message

re: In retrospect, Trump should have pardoned himself, his family and all J6 participants

Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:02 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99229 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:02 am to
quote:

It's not exactly clear what processes would be acceptable for the determination


Well...considering the Congress did not convict him of it, only the stupidest fricking judge would consider disqualification in the absence of a conviction.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423790 posts
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:06 am to
Yeah but that was a different process, impeachment.

That process was not specifically regarding his alleged behavior in the specific way you're using the term.

The 14A has a separate process for this:

quote:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.


It does not reference impeachment for this determination. It does reference a special Congressional act to remove the taint, which implies a special Congressional act to create the taint. If impeachment was the process, logic dictates it would have been referred to specifically.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 8:07 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram