- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In retrospect, Trump should have pardoned himself, his family and all J6 participants
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:02 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's not exactly clear what processes would be acceptable for the determination
Well...considering the Congress did not convict him of it, only the stupidest fricking judge would consider disqualification in the absence of a conviction.
Posted on 12/12/23 at 8:06 am to udtiger
Yeah but that was a different process, impeachment.
That process was not specifically regarding his alleged behavior in the specific way you're using the term.
The 14A has a separate process for this:
It does not reference impeachment for this determination. It does reference a special Congressional act to remove the taint, which implies a special Congressional act to create the taint. If impeachment was the process, logic dictates it would have been referred to specifically.
That process was not specifically regarding his alleged behavior in the specific way you're using the term.
The 14A has a separate process for this:
quote:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
It does not reference impeachment for this determination. It does reference a special Congressional act to remove the taint, which implies a special Congressional act to create the taint. If impeachment was the process, logic dictates it would have been referred to specifically.
This post was edited on 12/12/23 at 8:07 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News