Started By
Message

re: Sue and settle fricks US immigration policy for 8 years

Posted on 12/9/23 at 3:54 pm to
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69362 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Remain in Mexico is a much more important/effective policy. This one was more punitive than effective. The problem is asylum, which is mandated by our international agreements. We'd basically have to withdraw from the Geneva Convention to effectively do anything about asylum abuse.



Why do you do this? Nothing actually says we have to take people that are coming from all over the world.

In reality a lot of the past and present Central Americans should seek asylum in the nearest country. So like Mexico, which isn’t a poor country stacked up to all countries.

And we sure as hell shouldn’t be taking people from anywhere across the Atlantic or pacific.



Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425811 posts
Posted on 12/9/23 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Why do you do this? Nothing actually says we have to take people that are coming from all over the world.

If they claim asylum, we do, under the Geneva convention. Like I said, "We'd basically have to withdraw from the Geneva Convention to effectively do anything about asylum abuse."

quote:

In reality a lot of the past and present Central Americans should seek asylum in the nearest country. So like Mexico, which isn’t a poor country stacked up to all countries.

Like I said, "Remain in Mexico is a much more important/effective policy."

quote:

And we sure as hell shouldn’t be taking people from anywhere across the Atlantic or pacific.


Irrelevant
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram