- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House across from Walk On's in Zachary
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:27 pm to Finch
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:27 pm to Finch
Yes you can if it benefits the “public good” in some way. That’s the whole point of the Kelo decision.
LINK /
quote:
one of the most controversial property rights decisions in the history of the Supreme Court. Although the Fifth Amendment only permits the taking of private property for "public use," the Court ruled that the transfer of condemned land to private parties for "economic development" is permitted by the Constitution—even if the government cannot prove that the expected development will ever actually happen. Building on earlier decisions such as Berman v. Parker (1954), a closely divided 5-4 majority ruled that virtually any potential benefit to the public qualifies as a "public use."
LINK /
Posted on 12/4/23 at 10:31 pm to zippyputt
What was the public good?
It benefitted a private development.
Should be one of those cases Tulane takes up to actually benefit citizens and the statem
It benefitted a private development.
Should be one of those cases Tulane takes up to actually benefit citizens and the statem
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News