The pic of the tag tells you who owns the car but not who was driving it at the time. Was there a pic of the driver, or is everyone assuming that only the registered owner of vehicles drive them?

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Tigers2287

Member since Apr 2023

19 posts

Posted on 12/3/23 at 10:08 pm to Twenty 49

quote:
The pic of the tag tells you who owns the car but not who was driving it at the time. Was there a pic of the driver, or is everyone assuming that only the registered owner of vehicles drive them?

Would that even matter??? Unless the person is personally excluded from driving the vehicle. No criminal charges were filed.

This post was edited on 12/3/23 at 10:09 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Rabby

Member since Mar 2021

600 posts

Posted on 12/4/23 at 12:39 am to Twenty 49

quote:

The pic of the tag tells you who owns the car but not who was driving it at the time. Was there a pic of the driver, or is everyone assuming that only the registered owner of vehicles drive them?

quote:
but luckily, the car behind her (Cadillac) actually had a pic of the perpetrators tag from camera which was used in the police report and ultimately, to name the perp.

Why do you assume that the image was restricted to the license plate and failed to depict the driver?

Apparently, between the statement of the witness who supplied the image and the image, someone was able to "name the perp."

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Rabby

Member since Mar 2021

600 posts

Posted on 12/5/23 at 2:23 pm to Twenty 49

Besides, the civil liability for the costs of repairing the damage follows the policy of the vehicle involved - even if the driver is not certain. So a witness with a clear image of the plate pretty much puts the claim beyond the preponderance of evidence threshold in my experience.

Thanks to the Caddy driver for doing the right thing!

0 ...

Report Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board