- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The idea that you should account for an injured quarterback
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:49 am to lsupride87
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:49 am to lsupride87
quote:
What’s the cutoff too. Injured left tackle? Top WR?
this is something a lot of the dullards on the other side of the argument don't seem to really play through fully in their heads.
I mean Brock Bowers is one of hte best players in america and a top 10 draft pick and we were without him for a bit. Had we lost one of those games, should that be completely wiped away and ignored? Of course not...so we're going to do it for jordan travis? So...jordan travis is important enough to the team to exclude them from teh playoffs but brock bowers isn't important enough...who is the arbiter of that fine line on which player is or isn't important enough? Taht's dangerous territory and it's not the committee's jobs. Nor shoudl it be. Their job is to look at resumes, and you literally can't have a better resume than 13-0 P5 champion.
People are going to be stunned when FSU gets in and bama is left out, and they're going to come up with all kinds of conspiracy theories or this that and the other, when in reality the committee is going to do what they've done the last 9 years and do it correctly.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News