Started By
Message

re: The idea that you should account for an injured quarterback

Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:49 am to
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
87277 posts
Posted on 12/3/23 at 9:49 am to
quote:

What’s the cutoff too. Injured left tackle? Top WR?




this is something a lot of the dullards on the other side of the argument don't seem to really play through fully in their heads.

I mean Brock Bowers is one of hte best players in america and a top 10 draft pick and we were without him for a bit. Had we lost one of those games, should that be completely wiped away and ignored? Of course not...so we're going to do it for jordan travis? So...jordan travis is important enough to the team to exclude them from teh playoffs but brock bowers isn't important enough...who is the arbiter of that fine line on which player is or isn't important enough? Taht's dangerous territory and it's not the committee's jobs. Nor shoudl it be. Their job is to look at resumes, and you literally can't have a better resume than 13-0 P5 champion.

People are going to be stunned when FSU gets in and bama is left out, and they're going to come up with all kinds of conspiracy theories or this that and the other, when in reality the committee is going to do what they've done the last 9 years and do it correctly.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram