re: So to all the posters who were on the "Trump committed fraud to get his loans" crowd

That’s a negative, Ghost Rider. I am proposing two theories: (1) that the judge’s opinion/valuation clearly leaves much room for debate and understandable disagreement; and (2) a mere superficial look at the numbers having been presented tends more towards substantial error and undervaluation on the part of the judge than they do overvaluation by the Trump people, or put another way, the glaring gap between one of the three referenced figures is to the extreme far end of the “spectrum,” while two of those three are much more comparable to each other. At least much, much more so than to the judge’s numbers. What does that translate to, possibly? That the judge has shown himself to be comically biased against Trump. That’s this fella’s opinion anyway.