Started By
Message

re: Prehistoric women were probably better at hunting than men, scientists suggest

Posted on 11/30/23 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 11/30/23 at 6:52 pm to
ghgjkl
This post was edited on 12/31/23 at 11:42 pm
Posted by Irish Knuckles
Nuwallins
Member since Jan 2015
730 posts
Posted on 11/30/23 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Previous studies have shown that women are better suited physiologically to endurance activities and sports, which would provide an advantage as primitive hunters.


duh. they're suited to anything that's slow because they're slow and weak and can't do anything else. lol. stupid bitch. i guess because women aren't very athletic they must be better than men at something else. LOL.

who believes this sort of thing? lulz, "i'm slow and weak so ima say i jog better than men even though i don't". frickin elite slowness. "i was just proving to my boyfriend that he's not as slow as me."

this is the derp, derp type of scientific method. "the doctrine of what's not because we can't prove that it is."

figures it's coming from an anthropologist who thinks they're a scientist.

ima start calling her "the south bend sloth".
This post was edited on 11/30/23 at 7:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram