- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Elon Musk to advertisers pulling ads...epic
Posted on 11/29/23 at 5:35 pm to LegendInMyMind
Posted on 11/29/23 at 5:35 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Twitter’s value has plummeted by almost two-thirds since Elon Musk acquired the company in October 2022, one of the social media company’s only remaining external investors has admitted.
Fidelity, an asset manager that held a stake in Twitter worth about $20m after Musk acquired the business for $44bn, said in a corporate filing that its stake was now worth just under $6.6m. That would value the overall company, now officially called X Holdings Corp after Musk’s early venture X.com, at just $14.75bn.
Posted on 11/29/23 at 5:36 pm to EarlyCuyler3
You'll kill it this time, baw.....that former bird app is surely dead!
Posted on 11/29/23 at 6:15 pm to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
Twitter’s value has plummeted by almost two-thirds since Elon Musk acquired the company in October 2022, one of the social media company’s only remaining external investors has admitted.
Fidelity, an asset manager that held a stake in Twitter worth about $20m after Musk acquired the business for $44bn, said in a corporate filing that its stake was now worth just under $6.6m. That would value the overall company, now officially called X Holdings Corp after Musk’s early venture X.com, at just $14.75bn.
Not a defense, but isn't this a bit misleading. As I recall, the accepted valuation of Twitter was significantly lower than the $44b he paid, and was likely part of the reason he tried to get out of the deal before it closed.
So it would be inaccurate to say he's responsible for all of that devaluation, and a real analysis would rather much more effort than the quote provides, factoring in such things as overall losses in tech valuations and so forth.
In a nutshell, there's a difference between overpaying and destruction of value from management decisions. Similar to overpaying for a house vs letting goats poop inside of it afterwards.
This post was edited on 11/29/23 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 11/29/23 at 7:38 pm to EarlyCuyler3
quote:
Twitter’s value has plummeted by almost two-thirds since Elon Musk acquired the company in October 2022, one of the social media company’s only remaining external investors has admitted. Fidelity, an asset manager that held a stake in Twitter worth about $20m after Musk acquired the business for $44bn, said in a corporate filing that its stake was now worth just under $6.6m. That would value the overall company, now officially called X Holdings Corp after Musk’s early venture X.com, at just $14.75bn.
Anyone using this as a legit excuse for saying Musk is mismanaging Twitter really doesn’t understand corporate finance. Fidelity is able to massage that number to lower the cost of equity on their books. Since it’s private, they have plenty of leeway in valuing Twitter. By writing it down, they can use the “loss” to offset equity gains elsewhere, thus reducing taxes. It also allows them to record a gain on Twitter later on.
On a separate note, I don’t think Musk really cares if he loses money on Twitter. It’s pretty obvious that the 1st amendment is sacrosanct to him.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News